UnitFlip

Millimeters of Mercury to Pounds per Square Inch Converter

1 millimeter of mercury ≈ 0.0193367793 pounds per square inch

From

Almost identical to the torr, but defined separately. This uses conventional mmHg, not a temperature-specific mercury-column realization.

To
Result

1 millimeter of mercury equals 0.0193368 pounds per square inch

How to convert millimeters of mercury to pounds per square inch

Unit conversion preserves the pressure reference. Gauge pressure and absolute pressure are different readings; changing between them also needs the ambient pressure. Mercury and water-column units use the conventions stated in their unit notes.

Formula
psi = mmHg × 0.01933677928

One millimeter of mercury is 0.01933677928 pounds per square inch, so a single multiplication converts any value.

Example
0.193368 psi ≈ 10 × 0.01933677928

Almost identical to the torr, but defined separately. This uses conventional mmHg, not a temperature-specific mercury-column realization.

Millimeters of mercury to pounds per square inch conversion table

Common values in millimeters of mercury, converted to pounds per square inch.

Millimeters of mercury converted to pounds per square inch
Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Pounds per square inch (psi)
10.019336779
20.038673559
30.058010338
40.077347117
50.096683896
100.19336779
200.38673559
250.48341948
500.96683896
1001.9336779
2504.8341948
5009.6683896
1,00019.336779

About these units

millimeter of mercurymmHg

The conventional millimetre of mercury: 133.3224 Pa, following the NIST SP 811 convention.

Reference: NIST Special Publication 811.

pound per square inchpsi

One pound-force per square inch. The US standard for tyre and fluid pressure.

Sources and precision

Table results are rounded to 8 significant digits; formula constants may be rounded to 10. Worked example answers use 6 significant digits. The converter starts at 6 significant digits and lets you change display precision. Calculations use the stored factors without intermediate rounding. Exact unit definitions do not make an input measurement more precise; conventional and measured factors follow the assumptions stated here.