UnitFlip

Liters per 100 Kilometers to Miles per Imperial Gallon Converter

mpg (imp) = 282.4809363 ÷ L/100 km

From

An inverse measure: 5 L/100 km is twice as efficient as 10 L/100 km, not half.

To
Result

1 liter per 100 kilometers equals 282.481 miles per imperial gallon

How to convert liters per 100 kilometers to miles per imperial gallon

Distance per fuel (mpg or km/L) increases with economy; fuel per distance (L/100 km) decreases. Converting between these forms is reciprocal, requires a positive value and depends on whether a gallon is US or Imperial.

Formula
mpg (imp) = 282.4809363 ÷ L/100 km

These units run in opposite directions: one measures distance per unit of fuel and the other fuel per unit of distance. Dividing 282.4809363 by the liter per 100 kilometers figure gives the mile per imperial gallon figure, and dividing it back returns the original — which is why a lower number is better on one scale and worse on the other.

Example
35.3101 mpg (imp) ≈ 282.4809363 ÷ 8

An inverse measure: 5 L/100 km is twice as efficient as 10 L/100 km, not half.

Liters per 100 kilometers to miles per imperial gallon conversion table

Common values in liters per 100 kilometers, converted to miles per imperial gallon.

Liters per 100 kilometers converted to miles per imperial gallon
Liters per 100 kilometers (L/100 km)Miles per imperial gallon (mpg (imp))
394.160312
470.620234
556.496187
647.080156
740.354419
835.310117
931.386771
1028.248094
1223.540078
1518.832062

About these units

liter per 100 kilometersL/100 km

Fuel used to travel 100 kilometres. Lower is better. The European standard.

mile per imperial gallonmpg (imp)

Distance per imperial gallon. The UK fuel-economy standard.

Sources and precision

Table results are rounded to 8 significant digits; formula constants may be rounded to 10. Worked example answers use 6 significant digits. The converter starts at 6 significant digits and lets you change display precision. Calculations use the stored factors without intermediate rounding. Exact unit definitions do not make an input measurement more precise; conventional and measured factors follow the assumptions stated here.