UnitFlip

Miles per Imperial Gallon to Liters per 100 Kilometers Converter

L/100 km = 282.4809363 ÷ mpg (imp)

From
To

An inverse measure: 5 L/100 km is twice as efficient as 10 L/100 km, not half.

Result

1 mile per imperial gallon equals 282.481 liters per 100 kilometers

How to convert miles per imperial gallon to liters per 100 kilometers

Distance per fuel (mpg or km/L) increases with economy; fuel per distance (L/100 km) decreases. Converting between these forms is reciprocal, requires a positive value and depends on whether a gallon is US or Imperial.

Formula
L/100 km = 282.4809363 ÷ mpg (imp)

These units run in opposite directions: one measures distance per unit of fuel and the other fuel per unit of distance. Dividing 282.4809363 by the mile per imperial gallon figure gives the liter per 100 kilometers figure, and dividing it back returns the original — which is why a lower number is better on one scale and worse on the other.

Example
9.41603 L/100 km ≈ 282.4809363 ÷ 30

An inverse measure: 5 L/100 km is twice as efficient as 10 L/100 km, not half.

Miles per imperial gallon to liters per 100 kilometers conversion table

Common values in miles per imperial gallon, converted to liters per 100 kilometers.

Miles per imperial gallon converted to liters per 100 kilometers
Miles per imperial gallon (mpg (imp))Liters per 100 kilometers (L/100 km)
1028.248094
1518.832062
2014.124047
2511.299237
309.4160312
358.0708839
407.0620234
505.6496187
604.7080156

About these units

mile per imperial gallonmpg (imp)

Distance per imperial gallon. The UK fuel-economy standard.

liter per 100 kilometersL/100 km

Fuel used to travel 100 kilometres. Lower is better. The European standard.

Sources and precision

Table results are rounded to 8 significant digits; formula constants may be rounded to 10. Worked example answers use 6 significant digits. The converter starts at 6 significant digits and lets you change display precision. Calculations use the stored factors without intermediate rounding. Exact unit definitions do not make an input measurement more precise; conventional and measured factors follow the assumptions stated here.